Battle over Media Choice: Multiplex Tensions in the Online Community of Wikipedia
نویسندگان
چکیده
Media choice theories conceptualize decisions people make when they are faced with communication media alternatives to fit a communicative need. In this paper we address two gaps in extant research on media choice. First, we show that media choices may be intimately intertwined with the questions of power. The second contribution comes from situating an online community as the focus of media choice research – a novel combination. We conducted an interpretive case study on how power is intermingled with the choice of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) in the Finnish Wikipedia. We found that IRC was viewed in starkly different ways by different actors. Moreover, the IRC was largely associated with the notions of power. In particular, it was related to accession and ability to influence decisionmaking in the community. One party perceived IRC as a useful and open channel for quick-tempo collaborations and informal interactions, while others saw it as an arena for “the elite” to scheme against “the proletariat”. Overall, IRC was a source of “multiplex tensions”: conflicts originating from communication being dispersed into multiple media and from different perceptions towards a medium. The study provides several important implications for theory and practice.
منابع مشابه
Utilizes the Community Detection for Increase Trust using Multiplex Networks
Today, e-commerce has occupied a large volume of economic exchanges. It is known as one of the most effective business practices. Predicted trust which means trusting an anonymous user is important in online communities. In this paper, the trust was predicted by combining two methods of multiplex network and community detection. In modeling the network in terms of a multiplex network, the relat...
متن کاملImagining the Wikipedia community: What do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their 'community'?
This article examines the way Wikipedia authors write their ‘community’ into being. Mobilizing concepts regarding the communicative constitution of communities, the computer-mediated conversation between editors were investigated using Grounded Theory procedures. The analysis yielded an empirically grounded theory of the users’ self-understanding of the Wikipedia community as ethos-action commu...
متن کاملJointly They Edit: Examining the Impact of Community Identification on Political Interaction in Wikipedia
BACKGROUND In their 2005 study, Adamic and Glance coined the memorable phrase 'divided they blog', referring to a trend of cyberbalkanization in the political blogosphere, with liberal and conservative blogs tending to link to other blogs with a similar political slant, and not to one another. As political discussion and activity increasingly moves online, the power of framing political discour...
متن کاملSearch in Conversational Social Media Collections
Community generated content has become increasingly important over the past several years: blogs, Wikipedia, online forums, twitter, Yahoo! Answers, Facebook and many other online communities that foster social interaction have flourished. However, studying “Search in Social Media” as a distinct sub-field of information retrieval poses some questions. Although there is a loose consensus of the ...
متن کاملWhen Wiki Technology Meets Corporate Knowledge Management Routines: A Sociomateriality Perspective
There seems to be an inherent tension between wiki affordances—open boundaries, unconstrained editing, and transparency—and traditional knowledge management (KM) routines used in firms. The objective of this study is to investigate how users respond to these tensions during adoption of wiki technology at the workplace. The theoretical lens of sociomateriality highlights the manner in which rout...
متن کامل